Feb 03, 2026

Holding Foreign Manufacturers Liable for Product Injuries

Holding Foreign Manufacturers Liable for Product Injuries

Defective products cause thousands of injuries every year in the United States. When those products are manufactured overseas, injured consumers often ask: Can I hold a foreign manufacturer legally responsible? In many cases, the answer is yes but foreign manufacturer products liability cases involve additional legal hurdles, especially involving jurisdiction, importer liability, and federal safety regulations. Below is an updated explanation of how U.S. law addresses foreign-manufactured products and what injured individuals should know about pursuing compensation.

Understanding U.S. Product Liability Law

U.S. product liability law allows injured individuals to pursue compensation when a defective product causes harm. Claims typically fall under three legal theories:

  • Strict liability (product was defective and unreasonably dangerous)
  • Negligence (manufacturer failed to exercise reasonable care)
  • Breach of warranty (product failed to meet promises)

While product liability law is largely governed by state law, federal courts recognize these doctrines broadly. Foreign companies are not automatically immune from U.S. liability. However, courts must first determine whether they have authority to exercise jurisdiction over the company.

The Biggest Legal Hurdle: Personal Jurisdiction

Before suing foreign manufacturers in the U.S., a court must determine whether it has personal jurisdiction over that company. Under U.S. constitutional due process principles, a defendant must have “minimum contacts” with the forum state. The U.S. Supreme Court explains this standard in International Shoe Co. v. Washington (326 U.S. 310 (1945))

In foreign product liability lawsuits, courts often apply what is known as the “stream of commerce” doctrine analyzing whether the manufacturer purposefully directed its products into the U.S. market. In J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro (564 U.S. 873 (2011)), the Supreme Court limited automatic jurisdiction over foreign manufacturers, emphasizing that merely placing goods into the stream of commerce is not always enough. The manufacturer must have targeted the U.S. market or a specific state. This decision significantly shaped how courts evaluate foreign product claims today.

When Jurisdiction Exists

A U.S. court is more likely to exercise jurisdiction if the foreign manufacturer:

  • Markets directly to U.S. consumers
  • Uses U.S. distributors intentionally
  • Designs products for U.S. regulatory compliance
  • Maintains a U.S. subsidiary
  • Ships substantial product volume into the state

The Supreme Court further clarified jurisdiction standards in Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court (592 U.S. (2021)), explaining that a defendant’s contacts must relate to the claims at issue.

Importers and Distributors: Often the Primary Target

Even if a foreign manufacturer cannot be sued directly, injured plaintiffs can often pursue claims against:

  • U.S. importers
  • Distributors
  • Wholesalers
  • Retail sellers

Under the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA), the term “manufacturer” includes importers who bring products into the United States (15 U.S.C. § 2052(a)(11). This rule allows courts to treat importers as manufacturers for liability purposes. Additionally, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) enforces product safety compliance obligations for importers. As a result, many foreign product injury cases focus on U.S.-based importers. They are subject to U.S. jurisdiction.

Types of Defects in Foreign-Made Products

The same defect categories apply whether the product is domestic or foreign:

1. Design Defects

A flaw in the product’s inherent design makes it unreasonably dangerous.

2. Manufacturing Defects

Errors during production make a particular product unsafe.

3. Failure to Warn (Marketing Defects)

Inadequate instructions or warnings make a product dangerous. The Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability outlines these categories and remains influential in product litigation nationwide.

OSHA and Federal Safety Standards

Foreign-manufactured industrial equipment must comply with U.S. safety standards. For workplace products, OSHA regulations may apply. Failure to meet federal safety standards can support a negligence claim, particularly where a product does not meet required safety specifications.

Evidence Challenges in Foreign Product Cases

Suing foreign manufacturers can involve practical difficulties:

However, U.S. courts frequently allow discovery through international procedures.

Insurance and Supply Chain Liability

Importers often carry product liability insurance because they face exposure for foreign-made goods. The U.S. Small Business Administration explains that businesses distributing products must carry appropriate liability coverage to mitigate exposure. In litigation, defendants in the supply chain may pursue indemnity or contribution claims among themselves.

Compensation Available for Foreign Product Injuries

If a defective foreign product causes injury, a plaintiff may recover:

  • Medical expenses
  • Lost wages
  • Future earning capacity
  • Pain and suffering
  • Permanent disability damages

Product liability compensation standards are governed by state tort law but generally follow established negligence and strict liability frameworks.

Practical Legal Strategy

Attorneys handling foreign product injury claims often:

  • Name every entity in the supply chain
  • Establish jurisdiction through distribution and marketing evidence
  • Leverage federal regulatory compliance violations
  • Pursue importers when foreign manufacturers lack sufficient U.S. contacts
  • Use international discovery tools when necessary

Contact An Experienced Attorney 

You can hold foreign manufacturers accountable for product injuries under U.S. law but jurisdiction and supply chain structure matter. Even when foreign entities resist U.S. lawsuits, importers, distributors, and retailers often remain legally responsible under American product liability principles. If a foreign-manufactured product injured you, consult a product liability attorney who understands jurisdictional strategy, federal safety standards, and supply chain accountability.
 

If you are interested in setting up a time to meet with attorney David Jasmer in our downtown Chicago office, please get in touch We don't collect attorney fees unless we obtain compensation for you.